sales@rlmsolutions.com | (888) 800-0106 | Schedule a Call
Cloud & Application Security

Protect Cloud Workloads at Runtime — Not Just at Deployment

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) secure running workloads — virtual machines, containers, and serverless functions — through runtime threat detection, vulnerability assessment, behavioral monitoring, and micro-segmentation that controls workload-to-workload communication.

Overview

What RLM Delivers on Cloud Workload Protection

CSPM catches configuration problems; CWPP catches threats in running workloads. Attackers who penetrate your cloud environment move laterally between workloads — CWPP detects this movement and provides the response capabilities to contain threats before they spread.

Advisory Approach

How We Approach Cloud Workload Protection

A structured path through the Cloud Workload Protection decision — current-state discovery, shortlist and benchmark, commercial negotiation, then support until it is actually working.

1

Workload Inventory & Risk Assessment

We inventory your cloud workload estate — EC2 instances, EKS clusters, Lambda functions, Azure VMs, GKE pods — and assess the security posture of each workload type against vulnerability exposure, privilege levels, and network exposure.

Workload InventoryRisk AssessmentPrivilege Analysis
2

CWPP Platform Evaluation

We evaluate CWPP platforms — Wiz, Prisma Cloud CWPP, Orca Security, Lacework, CrowdStrike Falcon for Cloud — against your workload types, deployment model, and the runtime detection depth required for your threat model.

Platform ComparisonRuntime DetectionContainer Coverage
3

Runtime Protection Architecture

We design the runtime protection architecture — agent vs. agentless deployment, micro-segmentation policy design, and the anomaly detection configuration that distinguishes legitimate workload behavior from attack activity.

Architecture DesignMicro-segmentationAnomaly Detection
4

Vulnerability & Configuration Remediation

CWPP vulnerability findings require integration with CI/CD pipelines for developer remediation. We design the remediation workflow that surfaces findings to developers at the right point in the development lifecycle.

Remediation WorkflowCI/CD IntegrationDeveloper Enablement
Evaluation Criteria

Cloud Workload Protection Evaluation Criteria

Before committing to any Cloud Workload Protection platform, these are the points worth forcing a straight answer on.

01

Agent vs. Agentless

Agent-based CWPP provides deep runtime visibility and enforcement capability; agentless provides broad coverage with minimal deployment overhead. Evaluate the coverage depth vs. deployment complexity trade-off for your workload types.

02

Container & Kubernetes Coverage

Container workloads require specialized protection — image scanning, runtime behavioral detection, and Kubernetes admission control. Evaluate container-specific capabilities if Kubernetes is part of your environment.

03

Serverless Coverage

Serverless functions are difficult to protect with traditional agents. Evaluate the platform's serverless security capabilities — Lambda, Azure Functions, GCP Cloud Run — if serverless is significant in your environment.

04

East-West Traffic Visibility

Lateral movement between cloud workloads is a primary attack technique. Evaluate the platform's visibility into workload-to-workload communication and the micro-segmentation capabilities that restrict unnecessary east-west traffic.

05

CI/CD Integration for Shift-Left

Catching vulnerabilities in running production workloads is late in the lifecycle. Evaluate CI/CD integration — image scanning in pipelines, infrastructure-as-code security scanning — that prevents vulnerable workloads from reaching production.

06

CNAPP Consolidation

Modern platforms combine CSPM, CWPP, and CIEM capabilities into Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP). Evaluate whether a consolidated CNAPP approach better serves your requirements than separate CSPM and CWPP tools.

"RLM helped us build a security program that satisfied our board and our auditors — without locking us into a single vendor's roadmap. Their independence is the whole point."

CISO — Mid-Market Financial Services Firm

We stay involved through implementation, because selection is the easy half.

A Sample of the Security Providers We Evaluate

CrowdStrikeFortinetPalo Alto NetworksZscalerProofpointeSentireForesite Cybersecurity

RLM is vendor neutral. These are among 600+ providers in our evaluation set — inclusion here is not an endorsement, and we are paid by the provider you choose, not by any provider in particular. How that works →

Thinking About Cloud Workload Protection?

Start with a no-cost conversation with an RLM security advisor — vendor neutral, no agenda, just clarity on where your gaps are and the right path to close them.

Talk to a Security Advisor

Talk to an Advisor